Close

ADA describes Govt response to Senate Inquiry as a wasted opportunity

Australian Dental Association
Australian Dental Association
18 July 2024
1 minute read
  • Advocacy

The nation’s peak dental body has accused the Federal Government of neglecting the oral health of Australia’s most vulnerable populations over failure to properly fund dental services.

The nation's dentists have slated as a wasted opportunity the Government’s failure to properly consider funding dental services for Australia’s most vulnerable populations.

The Government today (July 18) released its response to the Inquiry into Senate Select Committee into the Provision of and Access to Dental Services in Australia, held last year, which made 35 recommendations to the Government, including several from the Australian Dental Association (ADA).

Key to our recommendations was to implement a Seniors Dental Benefits Schedule along the lines of the existing scheme for children, which would include providing funded dental care for over 200,000 seniors in residential aged care.

“It would only cost the Government $15 bn a decade compared with trying to include dental into Medicare for every Australian, at a cost of at least $77 bn a decade, it’s estimated.

“So it makes perfect sense for the Government to have adopted the more financially palatable roadmap we propose for seniors, and then roll it out to other vulnerable populations including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations and those on low incomes as outlined in the ADA’s Australian Dental Health Plan, (link below),” said ADA President Dr Scott Davis.

“But instead of doing that, the Government has chosen to ignore our solution for tackling the oral health issue of millions of seniors, as well as those other populations.”

Council on the Ageing data shows 40% over 55s delayed dental treatment in the last 12 months due to cost, increasing to 44% for those on lower incomes, including pensioners and those in aged care.

In addition the Government has sidestepped the need to address the issue of diminishing access to general anaesthetic services for children and special needs patients unable to have care in a general dental clinic.

The Senate report recognised the need for the Child Dental Benefits Scheme to be extended for services under general anaesthetic which would have contributed to improving this issue, but clearly they don’t care about this sector of the community either.

Dr Davis added: “Doesn’t the government realize it’s a whole lot cheaper to fix people’s oral health in dental clinics and dental hospitals than have people suffering in pain and presenting at hospital emergency departments?

“Our plan is a defined and clear roadmap out of this disaster, and not taking it up is a wasted opportunity and short-termist by the Albanese administration.

“If the Government chooses to ignore the recommendations of the Parliamentary Senate Inquiry, what’s the point of the Inquiry? Has it all been a whitewash and a show pony?”